Indexing & Abstracting
Full Text
Review ArticleDOI Number : 10.36811/jca.2022.110038Article Views : 0Article Downloads : 0
The role effect of phenolic compounds of graviola on enhance lipid profile in male rabbits
Hameda TA*1, Fathia MA2 and Fayrouz AK1
1Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Omar El-Mokhtar University, El -Beyda-Libya
2Chemistry Department, Faculty of Education/ Janzour, Tripoli University, Libya
*Corresponding Author: Fayrouz AK, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Omar El-Mokhtar University, El -Beyda-Libya; Email: fayalzobair@yahoo.com
Article Information
Aritcle Type: Review Article
Citation: Hameda TA, Fathia MA, Fayrouz AK. 2022. The role effect of phenolic compounds of graviola on enhance lipid profile in male rabbits. J Chem Appl. 4: 07-12.
Copyright: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright © 2022; Hameda TA
Publication history:
Received date: 14 March, 2022Accepted date: 30 March, 2022
Published date: 01 April, 2022
Abstract
Graviola, called is annona muricata an evergreen plant of the Annonaceae family, mainly distributed in tropical and subtropical parts of the world. The major bioactive components of graviola is acerogenins, rutin, quercetin, kaempferol which have been shown to have anticancer and anti-arthritis. Rabbits were orally given sublethal dose of graviola (100 mg/kg BW) was given alone. The tested doses were given to rabbits every day for 6 weeks. Results showed that graviola caused a significant (PB/0.05) decrease in the levels of plasma cholesterol, triglyceride (TG) and low density lipoprotein (LDL), while the level of high density lipoprotein (HDL) increased.
Keywords: Paracetamol; TBARS; Glutathione S-Transferase; Rabbits
Introduction
Graviola, which belongs to the Annonaceae family, is commonly known as annona. muricata Linn soursop, or guanabana. It is native to sub-Saharan countries though it is now widely cultivated in many tropical countries in the world such as India, Malaysia and Nigeria [1]. Often, this plant is sought for its therapeutic effects. Each part of the tree i.e. the root, stem-bark, leaves, fruit and even the seed is used in traditional medicines around the world [2]. The supposed therapeutic benefits of the soursop have attracted intensive research on the chemical composition of the leaves and seeds that has led to the finding of acetogenin compounds [3]. This molecular structure is a very potent compound against cancer as it deprives the high-energy demanding cancer cells of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) supply via the disruption of the mitochondrial electron transport system, resulting in apoptosis [4]. These isolated compounds, which are secondary metabolites/antioxidants, answer the potential of the soursop for possessing anti-cancer, insecticidal, sedating as well as pain and immunosuppressing properties [5]. Additionally, graviola leaf aqueous extract was found to alleviate the pancreatic B-cells of Streptozotocintreated diabetic rats by directly quenching lipid peroxides and indirectly enhancing production of endogenous antioxidants, thus addressing its antioxidant potential [6,7], reported that the hepatoprotective and antioxidant activity of soursop stem bark extract against oxidative stress in rats induced by DM as determined from plasma enzyme markers. According to [8], ethanol-induced gastric injury in rabbits could be treated by ethyl acetate extract of graviola leaves, which provide a suppressive effect against oxidative damage and a preservative effect on gastric wall mucus. Despite extensive research into the antioxidant level and activity possessed by graviola and its effectiveness in treating disease, a comparative study of the antioxidant level and activity of graviola obtained from different locations has not been reported. Nonetheless, previous studies have shown that there are different levels of antioxidant/phenolic content among plants of similar species. Extensive phytochemical evaluations on different parts of the A. muricata plant have shown the presence of various phyto constituents and compounds, including alkaloids (ALKs) [9,10], megastigmanes (MGs) [11], Flavonol triglycosides (FTGs) [12], phenolics (PLs) [13], cyclopeptides (CPs) and essential oils [14,15] (Figure 1). However, Annona species, including A. muricata, have been shown to bea generally rich source of annona ceousace to gen in compounds (AGEs) [16].
Figure 1: Chemical structures of the major compounds isolated from Graviola
Materials and Methods
Tested compounds
In this study graviola was purchased from maximum international company, Brasil. Each capsule contains 3 g powder and the content of each capsule was dissolved in corn oil just before use.
Experimental animals
Mature male New Zealand White rabbits (age of 6 months and initial weight of (1.641 ? 27.2 Kg) were used. Animals were individually housed in cages and weighed weekly throughout 6- Week experimental period. Ten mature male rabbits were randomly divided into two groups (each five rabbits) as follows: - Group ?: Rabbits were used as control daily for six successive weeks. Group II: Rabbits were treated with graviola was given daily by gavage at a dose of 100 mg/kg B.W, [ 17-19], which dissolved in corn oil for four successive weeks. Blood Specimens
Blood samples about 3 ml were collected from the ear vein of all animals every week throughout the 6-week experimental period. Blood samples were obtained in the morning before accesses to feed and water and placed immediately on ice. The blood samples were collected in tube containing heparin to obtain plasma. Plasma was obtained by centrifugation of samples at 860×g for 20 min, and was stored at (–20?C) until used for analysis. Stored plasma samples were analyzed for cholesterol and triglycerides (TG) were determined according to the methods of [20-22], respectively. High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c) was determined according to the methods of [23]. Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) was determined by the calculation (cholesterol-(TG/5+HDL-c).
Statistical Analysis
Where applicable, statistical analysis was carried out in Minitab software (version17)/ GraphPad prism8; statistical significance was assessed using ANOVA analysis with Tukey multiple comparison test after detection normal distribution to the data and appropriate P < 0.05 consider significant.
Results
Tables 1 illustrated the effect of graviola on the levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c and LDL-c) in blood plasma of male rabbits. The levels of, TC, TG,and LDL-c were significantly (P<0.05) decreased, while HDL-c, were significantly (P<0.05) increased in plasma of rabbits treated with graviola as compared with control group.
Table 1: Weekly average of plasma total cholesterol (TC; mg/dl) of male rabbits treated with graviola (means ± SE). |
||
|
Experimental groups |
Graviola |
Weeks |
Control |
120.0 ± 0.00 |
1 |
120.2 ± 1.54 |
111.0 ± 0.94 |
2 |
121.3 ± 2.46 |
93.25 ± 3.21 |
3 |
120.2 ± 0.47 |
84.20 ± 2.49 |
4 |
119.7 ± 0.31 |
77.85 ± 3.76 |
5 |
119.6 ± 0.51 |
76.82 ± 4.40 |
6 |
119.4 ± 0.40 |
93.85 ± 7.92c |
Overall means |
120.1 ± 1.16bc |
|
Data are expressed as mean ± SE of 5 rabbit. Within each row, means with different superscript (a, b, c or d) were significantly different at p<0.05. Where means superscripts with the same letters mean that there is no significant difference (p>0.05).
Table 2: Weekly average of plasma - triglyceride (TG; mg/dl) of male rabbits treated with graviola, (means ± SE). |
||
|
Experimental groups |
|
Weeks |
Control |
Graviola |
1 |
55.9 ± 0.39 |
57.0 ± 3.00 |
2 |
57.4 ± 1.83 |
58.0 ± 4.11 |
3 |
57.3 ± 0.50 |
52.5 ± 4.83 |
4 |
56.3 ± 5.25 |
47.3 ± 5.44 |
5 |
57.0 ± 2.10 |
46.2 ± 2.53 |
6 |
55.9 ± 0.39 |
57.0 ± 3.00 |
Overall means |
57.1 ± 1.0b |
50.17 ± 1.8a |
Data are expressed as mean ± SE of 5 rabbit. Within each row, means with different superscript (a, b, c or d) were significantly different at p<0.05. Where means superscripts with the same letters mean that there is no significant difference (p>0.05).
Table 3: Weekly average of plasma high-density lipoprotein- cholesterol (HDL-c; mg/dl) of male rabbits treated with graviola (means ± SE). |
||
|
Experimental groups |
|
Weeks |
Control |
Graviola |
1 |
45.16 ± 0.62 |
44.50 ± 1.56 |
2 |
44.56 ± 0.56 |
45.00 ± 1.51 |
3 |
44.45 ± 0.28 |
47.25 ± 0.79 |
4 |
44.46 ± 0.75 |
47.53 ± 0.92 |
5 |
43.97 ± 0.67 |
49.00 ± 0.71 |
6 |
44.35 ± 0.67 |
50.12 ± 1.48 |
Overall means |
44.51 ± 0.58a |
47.23 ± 1.43b |
Data are expressed as mean ± SE of 5 rabbit. Within each row, means with different superscript (a, b, c or d) were significantly different at p<0.05. Where means superscripts with the same letters mean that there is no significant difference (p>0.05).
Table4: Weekly average of plasma low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c; mg/dl) of male rabbits treated with graviola (means ± SE). |
||
|
Experimental groups |
|
Weeks |
Control |
Graviola |
1 |
63.92 ± 2.03 |
63.69 ± 7.41 |
2 |
65.08 ± 2.41 |
60.15 ± 2.54 |
3 |
64.41 ± 0.54 |
57.75 ± 1.85 |
4 |
63.97 ± 0.98 |
55.56 ± 1.45 |
5 |
64.25 ± 0.97 |
54.31 ± 3.60 |
6 |
63.66 ± 0.62 |
53.51 ± 3.48 |
Overall means |
64.22 ± 1.33a |
57.49 ± 3.91b |
Data are expressed as mean ± SE of 5 rabbit. Within each row, means with different superscript (a, b, c or d) were significantly different at p<0.05. Where means superscripts with the same letters mean that there is no significant difference (p>0.05).
Discussion
Numerous considers have shown that utilization of vegetables and natural products are emphatically related to lower rate of a few incessant no communicable illnesses. In spite of the fact that composition of natural product and vegetable juices is distinctive from that of the consumable parcel of natural products and vegetables, they contain polyphenols and vitamins from natural products and vegetables. Drinking vegetable and natural product juices is exceptionally well known in numerous nations, conjointly an effective way to make strides utilization of natural products and vegetables. The considers appeared that natural product and vegetable juices influence cardiovascular chance variables, such as bringing down blood weight and progressing blood lipid profiles. The most components of activity included antioxidant impacts, advancement of the angles of the cardiovascular framework, hindrance of platelet conglomeration, anti-inflammatory impacts, and avoidance of hyperhomocysteinemia. Drinking juices may be a potential way to progress cardiovascular wellbeing, particularly blends of juices since they contain a assortment of polyphenols, vitamins, and minerals from distinctive natural products and vegetables. [24] reports that A. muricata brings down hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. [25] illustrated that natural product and vegetable juice decrease add up to cholesterol within the body and improve cholesterol profile within the blood. The progressing blood lipids impacts of the juice mix were ascribed to the tall substance of add up to polyphenol.
Conclusion
The effects of graviola on lipid profile. A large number of studies supported the view that consumption of graviola could prevent the increase of blood pressure and improve lipids.
References
1. Gavamukulya Y, Abou EF, Wamunyokoli F. 2014. Phytochemical screening, anti-oxidant activity and in vitro anticancer potential of ethanolic and water leaves extracts of Annona muricata (Graviola). Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 7: 355-363. Ref.: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25312150/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1995-7645(14)60258-3
2. Onyechi U, Ibeanu U, Nkiruka V. 2012. Nutrient, phytochemical composition and sensory evaluation of soursop (Annona muricata) pulp and drink in South Eastern Nigeria. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 12: 53-57.
3. Moghadamtousi SZ, Karimian H, Rouhollahi E. 2014. Annona muricata leaves induce g1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through mitochondria-mediated pathway in human HCT-116 and HT-29 colon cancer cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 156: 277-289. Ref.: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25195082/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2014.08.011
4. McLaughlin JL. 2008. Paw paw and cancer: annonaceous acetogenins from discovery to commercial products. Journal of Natural products. 71: 1311-1321. Ref.: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18598079/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/np800191t
5. Bermejo A, Figadere B, Zafra PMC. 2005. Acetogenins from Annonaceae: Recent progress in isolation, synthesis and mechanisms of action. Natural Product Reports. 22: 269-303. Ref.: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15806200/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/b500186m
6. Adewole SO, Caxton M. 2006. Morphological changes and hypoglycemic effects of Annona muricata Linn. (Annonaceae) leaf aqueous extract on pancreatic B-cells of Streptozotocin-treated diabetic rats. African Journal of Biomedical Research. 9: 173-187.
7. Omale J, Olakunle S. 2015. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of antioxidant activity of Annona muricata stem bark extracts in Rattus norvegicus. Planta Medica. 81: 86.
8. Moghadamtousi SZ, Karimian H, Rouhollahi E. 2014. Annona muricata leaves induce g1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through mitochondria-mediated pathway in human HCT-116 and HT-29 colon cancer cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 156: 277-289. Ref.: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25195082/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2014.08.011
9. Lim YY, Quah EPL. 2007. Antioxidant properties of different cultivars of Portulaca oleracea. Food Chemistry. 103: 734-740.
10. Leboeuf M, Cavé A, Bhaumik P. 1980. The phytochemistry of the annonaceae. Phytochemistry. 21: 2783-2813.
11. Yang C, Gundala SR, Mukkavilli R. 2015. Synergistic interactions among flavonoids and acetogenins in graviola (Annona muricata) leaves confer protection against prostate cancer. Carcinogenesis 2015. Ref.: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25863125/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgv046
12. Matsushige A, Matsunami K, Kotake Y. 2012. Three new megastigmanes from the leaves of Annona muricata. J Nat Med. 66: 284-291. Ref.: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21892756/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11418-011-0583-1
13. Nawwar M, Ayoub N, Hussein S. 2012. Flavonol triglycoside and investigation of the antioxidant and cell stimulating activities of Annona muricata Linn. Archives of Pharmacal Research. 35: 761-767. Ref.: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22644843/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-012-0501-4
14. Jiménez VM, Gruschwitz M, Schweiggert RM. 2014. Identification of phenolic compounds in soursop (Annona muricata) pulp by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric detection. Food Res Int. 65: 42-46.
15. Polissier Y, Marion C, Kone D. 1994. Volatile components of Annona muricata L. J Essent Oil Res. 6: 411-414.
16. Kossouoh C, Moudachirou M, Adjakidje V. 2007. Essential oil chemical composition of Annona muricata L. Leaves from benin. J Essent Oil Res. 19: 307-309.
17. Rupprecht JK, Hui YH, McLaughlin JL. 1990. Annonaceous acetogenins: a review. Journal of natural products. 53: 237-278. Ref.: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2199608/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/np50068a001
18. Adimy M, Crauste F, Raun S. 2005. Modelling hematopiosis mediated by growth factors: Delay equations describing periodic haematological diseases. Ininternational workshop on differential equations in Mathematical Biology, Le Harve, France.
19. Arthur F, Woode E, Terlabi E. 2011. Evaluation of acute and subchronic toxicity of Annonamuricata (Linn.) aqueous extract in animals. Eur J ExpBiol. 1: 115-124.
20. Paulinus O, Kinsley A, Ikechi E. 2013. Protective effect of ethanolic leaf extract of Annona muricata Linn. On some early events in cycas induced colorectal carcinogenesis in rats. J Pharm SciInnov. 2: 14-21.
21. Knight JA, Anderson S, Rawle JM. 1972. Chemical basis of the sulpha-phosphovanillin reaction estimating total serum lipids. Clin Chem. 18: 199-202. Ref.: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5020813/
22. Watson DA. 1960. Simple method for the determination of serum cholesterol. Clin Chem Acta. 5: 589. Ref.: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13783424/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(60)90004-8
23. Carr T, Andressen CJ, Rudel L. 1993. Enzymatic determination of triglyceride, free cholesterol and total cholesterol in tissue lipid extracts. Clin Chem. 26: 39-42. Ref.: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8448837/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-9120(93)90015-x
24. Warnick GR, Benderson V, Albers N. 1983. Selected Methods. Clin Chem. 10: 91-99.
25. Sawant TP, Gogle DP. 2014. A brief review on recent advances in clinical research of Annona muricata. International journal of universal pharmacy and bio. Sciences. 3: 267-304.
26. Zheng J, Zhou Y, Li S. 2017. Effects and mechanisms of fruit and vegetable juices on cardiovascular diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 18: 555. Ref.: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28273863/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18030555