• Mail us:

    editor@raftpubs.org

Welcome to International Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health

Total Article Views : 8266 Total Article Downloads : 404

Indexing & Abstracting
  • Plagiarism Checker
  • Google Scholar
  • Publons
  • CiteFactor
  • Crossref (DOI: 10.36811)
  • DRJI
  • Scilit
  • Semetic Scholar
  • WorldCat
  • ICMJE
  • ORCID
  • Openaire
  • Zenodo
  • BASE
  • Mendeley
  • Growkudos
  • Researchgate
  • Academic Microsoft
  • Dimensions
  • ScienceGate

Full Text

Research ArticleDOI Number : 10.36811/ijpmh.2019.110004Article Views : 55Article Downloads : 43

Justification of Calculation of Illegal Drug Consumption

Andrey Soloviev1*, Yuri Bogdasarov2 and Elena Ichitovkina3

1Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head, Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, Russia
2MD, Chief Specialist - Psychiatrist, Department of Psychological Diagnostics, Center for Psychophysiological Diagnostics, Central Medical Unit, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Moscow, Russia
3Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Department of Psychological, Pedagogical and Medical Support of Internal Affairs Bodies Activities, All-Russian Institute for Advanced Studies, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Moscow, Russia

*Corresponding Author: Andrey Soloviev, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head, Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, Russia, Email: ASoloviev1@yandex.ru 

Article Information

Aritcle Type: Research Article

Citation: Andrey Soloviev, Yuri Bogdasarov, Elena Ichitovkina. 2019. Justification of Calculation of Illegal Drug Consumption. Int J Psychiatr Ment Health. 1: 27-32.

Copyright: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright © 2019; Andrey Soloviev

Publication history:

Received date: 28 August, 2019
Accepted date: 06 September, 2019
Published date: 10 September, 2019

Abstract

The drug situation monitoring system in Russia uses data on the number of drugs withdrawn from circulation in a weight indicator. However, this does not reflect the real extent of the danger, since differences in the activity of substances and population density of different administrative districts are not taken into account. Based on the analysis of statistical data, a methodology for calculating the prevalence of drugs based on the determination of conventional doses that are multiples of the size of the narcotic drugs, determining the onset of criminal liability and determining their prevalence in the territory of the administrative district per 100,000 population is proposed.

Keywords: Narcotic drugs; Methodology for calculating seized psychoactive substances; Drug situation; Drug monitoring

Determining the extent of the illicit distribution and consumption of narcotic drugs is one of the goals of monitoring the drug situation [5]. Among the sources of information about the extent of their proliferation appear and information about illegal traffic seizure of psychoactive substances (PAS) at the moment of criminal case [3]. The annual reports of the Russian State Anti-Narcotics Committee provide data on the weight of seized surfactants, while the degree of danger of individual drugs is not reflected [2]. As a result of this approach, an opinion is formed that the most common are the drugs of the cannabis group, which do not represent a significant social danger. In addition, differences in population in administrative districts are not taken into account. Thus, the modernization of methodological approaches to assessing the illegal distribution and consumption of surfactants is required, as, for example, this has already been proposed when taking into account the extent of alcohol-attributive mortality [6].

The purpose of the study is to justify the use of the methodology for calculating the amount of surfactants seized to determine the extent of their illegal distribution and consumption.

Materials and Research Methods

Analyzed special forms of interagency statistical reporting for 2015-2018 in the Russian Federation (RF). The data were converted into conventional doses in accordance with the established sizes of surfactants that determine the onset of criminal liability. Prevalence rates were calculated per 100,000 administrative district populations. St atistical processing of the research results was carried out using the SPSS 22.0 program. The search for linear relationships between the two features was carried out using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

The results of the study: For the period 2015-2018, Russian law enforcement authorities withdrawn from circulation more than 100 000 kg of PAS (Table. 1).

Table 1: The number of PAS seized by major groups for 2015-2018

in weight indicator (in kg).

Years

Opiates

Cannabinoids

Amphetamines

Cocaine

Spice

2015

3 170.3 

23 438.5 

3 383.7 

954.5

1 490.2 

2016

1 411.0 

15 084.1 

2 400.4 

143.7

710.4

2017

977.3

14 346.8 

4 490.9 

442.9

518.1

2018

1 161.5 

15 202.9 

3 457.1 

47.6

365.7

For the recalculation, we used the parameters of the PAS size, which are minimal for the formation of the offense and the onset of criminal liability (Table 2) [4].

Table 2: Minimal dimensions of narcotic drugs and plants for the formation of the offense and the onset of criminal liability (kg)

PAS

The size

(in kg)

PAS

The size

(in kg)

Opium group

Poppy straw

0.02

Opium

0.001

Acetylated Opium

0,0005

Morphine

0.0001

Heroin

0,0005

Desomorphine

0.00005

Sleeping pills

0.02

 

 

Cannabis group

Cannabis

0.006

Hashish

0.002

Cannabis oil

0,0004

Hemp

0.006

Amphetamine group

MDMA

0,0006

Methamphetamine

0,0003

Ephedron

0,0002

Mephedrone

0,0002

N-Methylephedrone

0,0002

 

 

Other narcotic drugs

Cocaine

0,0005

Synthetic cannabinoids

0.00005

The calculation was carried out according to the formula:

Conditional dose (c.d.) = weight / size (Table 3).

 

Table 3: The number of PAS seized by major groups for 2015-2018 (c.d.)

Years

Opiates

Cannabinoids

Amphetamines

Cocaine

Spice

2015

4 091 084

5 780 906

15 976 117

1 909 082

29 804 160

2016

1 978 608

3 801 500

10 843 087

287 490 

14 208 660

2017

1 077 322

3 574 850

19 267 123

885 844 

10 362 460

2018

1 478 612

3 913 087

15 595 920

95 106 

7 313 120

To assess the prevalence of PAS in administrative districts, seizure rates in arbitrary doses were recalculated to the level and prevalence according to the formula [1] (Table 4):

Prevalence = c.d. * 100,000 / population of the administrative district

Table 4: Levels of prevalence for major PAS groups for 2015-2018 by administrative district (in urban units per 100,000 population).

Years

Opiates

Cannabinoids

Amphetamines

Cocaine

Spice

Russian Federation

2015

2 797 

3 952 

10 923 

1 305 

20 377 

2016

1 350 

2 594 

7 399 

196

9 696 

2017

734

2 435 

13 124 

603

7 059 

2018

1 007 

2 666 

10 624 

65

4 982 

Central District

2015

6 821 

2 088 

5 742 

160

23 531 

2016

2 086 

1 175 

5 697 

79

18 223 

2017

1 357 

1 010 

15 519 

1 926 

4 389 

2018

2 301 

1 131 

14 310 

38

1 178 

Northwest District

2015

372

3 157 

3 897 

11 014 

12 409 

2016

372

2 262 

1 656 

23

6 430 

2017

717

950

31 196 

112

3 994 

2018

93

2 500 

2 100 

185

5 812 

North Caucasus District

2015

422

2 720 

1 179 

0

4 187 

2016

505

1 862 

2 183 

1

906

2017

351

1 075 

1 170 

2

572

2018

359

1 096 

1 768 

1

307

Southern District

2015

732

3 330 

4 346 

38

4 852 

2016

188

1 529 

4 490 

3

1 250 

2017

368

1 654 

4 409 

453

2 503 

2018

256

1 046 

4 474 

7

1 259 

Volga region

2015

871

1 361 

19 820 

7

18 863 

2016

1 550 

605

5 689 

3

5 818 

2017

435

651

5 369 

11

9 107 

2018

498

1 242 

10 614 

15

5 076 

Ural District

2015

1 608 

1 760 

12 041 

51

46 203 

2016

2 056 

1 402 

12 023 

3

12 486 

2017

674

1 038 

18 381 

10

14 709 

2018

999

1 180 

17 634 

41

22 632 

Siberian District

2015

3 301 

7 069 

13 659 

3

25 729 

2016

1 226 

6 031 

9 627 

4

10 742 

2017

476

3 758 

14 484 

18

11 411 

2018

770

3 355 

11 364 

5

6 835 

Far Eastern District

2015

745

27 232 

31 402 

0

15 430 

2016

316

14 742 

22 239 

-

4 253 

2017

314

23 244 

12 943 

2

8 452

2018

579

23 683 

12 600 

-

2 070 

Regional differences are noted, for example, a significant increase in the prevalence of amphetamines and a sharp decrease in synthetic cannabinoids in the Central Administrative District of RF, as well as high levels of spice prevalence, while opiates are insignificant, in the Far Eastern District. It should be noted that in both administrative districts, cocaine prevalence levels in recent years are close to zero.

Pearson's correlation coefficients for the structure of the prevalence of surfactants by administrative districts reveal the presence of significant differences in the indicators of the Far Eastern, North Caucasian and North-Western districts compared with the figures for RF as a whole, which, apparently, is determined by both regional characteristics of preferred consumption and the characteristics of the work of special services (Table 5).

Table 5: Pearson correlation coefficients for the prevalence of PAS in RF in 2015-2018.

Years

Central District

Northwest District

North Caucasus District

Southern District

Volga region

Ural District

Siberian District

Far Eastern District

2015

0,91

0,49

0,49

0,83

0,89

0,97

0,99

0,39

2016

0,89

0,84

0,48

0,61

0,96

0,97

0,95

0,22

2017

0,94

0,92

0,67

0,98

0,73

0,96

0,97

0,34

2018

0,90

0,43

0,82

0,98

0,99

0,77

0,99

0,15

Changing the structure of the withdrawn PAS when switching from measurement of absolute weight on prevalence rates in conventional doses per 100 000 population, for RF and the Central District are shown in (Figures 1-2).

ijpmh1004-figure1

Figure 1: The structure of seized PAS in RF in 2015-2018 (on the left - in the weight indicator, on the right - prevalence levels in c.d.)

ijpmh1004-figure2

Figure 2: The structure of seized PAS in the Central District in 2015-2018 (on the left - in the weight indicator, on the right - prevalence levels in c.d.)

It becomes clear that amphetamines (including synthetic cathinones) do not predominate in the structure of seizures in RF, and their specific gravity tends to increase. Synthetic cannabinoids (“spice”) also have a significantly larger specific gravity in the seizure structure than the weight analysis shows. However, their prevalence tends to decrease. The rates for opiates and cocaine are virtually unchanged. In the Central District, the overwhelming prevalence of amphetamines is noted, and the prevalence of cannabinoids is significantly lower than in RF. Spice consumption has declined rapidly in recent years.

Discussion of the Results

The results of the study show that the data on the weight indicator of PAS withdrawn from illegal trafficking does not reflect the degree of danger of individual drugs. Our proposed methodology for assessing the prevalence of surfactants from information on their seizure provides a more reliable picture of the spectrum and extent of consumption of controlled substances. This approach can be used in the overall integrated assessment when monitoring the drug situation at the federal and regional levels.

References

1. Demographic Yearbook of Russia. Stat. Sat / Rosstat. - M. 2017.

2. Methodology and procedure for monitoring, as well as criteria for assessing the development of drug situations in the Russian Federation and its constituent entities (third revision) [Electronic resource]: approved. Minutes of the meeting of the SAC of February 15, 2017 No. 32. The document was not published. Access from sprav.-legal system "Consultant Plus".

3. On the approval of significant, large and especially large sizes of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, as well as significant, large and especially large sizes for plants containing narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances, or their parts containing narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances, for the purposes of Articles 228, 228.1, 229 and 229.1 of the RF Criminal Code: approved. Government Decree RF of October 1, 2012. No. 1002 // Collected. RF Legislation. - 2012. - No. 41, Article 5624.

4. Regulation on the state system for monitoring drug situations in RF: approved. Government Decree RF of June 20, 2011. No. 485 // Collected. RF Legislation. - 2011. - No. 26, Article 3808. 5. Report on the drug situation in RFn in 2017 (excerpt) [Electronic resource] // State Anti-Drug Committee. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2lBD4vsn 

6. Soloviev AG, Vyazmin AM, Mordovsky EA. 2012. Methodological approaches to accounting for alcohol-attributive mortality in Russia and abroad // Reviews on clinical pharmacology and drug therapy. 10: 30-41.

Download Provisional PDF Here

Download PDF
Indexing
Platforms
Plagiarism Checker.png
Google_Scholar.png
Publons.jpg
Cite Factor.jpg
raft_ref1.jpg
DRJI.jpg
Scilit.jpg
Semetic scholar.jpg
Worldcat.jpg
icmje.png
orcid.jpg
openaire.jpg
zenodo_raft.jpg
raftpubs-base1.jpg
Mendeley.jpg
growkudos.jpg
researchgate.jpg
Academic Microsoft.jpg
dimensions-logo-400x801.png
sciencegate.png